Business | Less buck for the bang

Are drug patents worth it?

Politicians are attacking IP protection, but shareholders are Big Pharma’s bigger headache

|NEW YORK

ONE OF THE first rules of American politics is not to pick a fight with Big Pharma. Its army of lobbyists in Washington, DC, has ensured that presidents from both parties, from Ronald Reagan to Barack Obama, have upheld the industry’s stout defence of intellectual-property (IP) rights, including in international treaties. Donald Trump threatened to impose drug price controls, which won bipartisan support in Congress, but intense lobbying ensured that his initiative flopped. That effort to rein in Big Pharma chimed with the industry’s global image as arrogant and greedy.

President Joe Biden is throwing his weight behind a proposal at the World Trade Organisation to waive patent protections for covid-19 vaccines. If Mr Biden is willing to rethink IP rights for covid vaccines abroad, he might also have the audacity to take on patent protection for new drugs at home. To judge whether America’s industry deserves such treatment, it is worth asking three questions. First, how much innovation is happening? Second, is rent-seeking behaviour—ranging from price gouging to patent manipulation—declining? Third, what might happen if patent rules were watered down?

This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline "Less buck for the bang"

Ten million reasons to vaccinate the world

From the May 15th 2021 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Business

Does Perplexity’s “answer engine” threaten Google?

Taking aim at one of the best business models of all times

How not to work on a plane

Hours without interruption and work to do. What could go wrong?


Why does BHP want Anglo American?

Its $39bn takeover offer is the latest in a string of mining mega-mergers